|
Showing all 44 reviews...
|
|
 |
I thing this is the first time I give a 10 because I find this movie is incredible. Absolutely stunning, I find the ending is perfect wish I can buy it but my mom doesn't because she doesn't like the movie.
10/10
7.23.2008 -
gogermanygo@ - age: 1-12
A cute movie. Me and my friend found it to be light, and predictable. It had a few funny moments, but overall, the plot lacked excitment. We found it to be quite entertaining none the less. I would recomend this movie for someone who is interested in quaint, but not extraordinary films.
7/10
4.4.2008 -
raegann,a@ - age: 13-17
I thought it was entertaining and loved the idea of Diane being the one who comes up with the idea of it all. Was boring and subtle but great cast which made it funny, rent it don't go to the theatre to see.
8/10
3.19.2008 -
jenniferanddavidpower@ - age: 26-35
Weak characters, predictable script (was this written during the writer's strike? LOL)and generally mindless. First movie we have walked out on in over 10 years. Even Queen Latifah was weak!
1/10
2.22.2008 -
cbrown@ - age: 50+
Cute movie... a bit predictable, but entertaining nonetheless.
8/10
2.1.2008 -
sairync@ - age: 26-35
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Light & funny! Maybe not the best Chemistry between the Actors, has it's moments. 3 dumb women on a stupid quest of stealing more & more $$$! Duh! Trouble?!!!
6/10
2.1.2008 -
hairbond007@ - age: 26-35
It was a good movie, not earth moving or ground breaking but simply entertaining and fun, I enjoyed it!
7/10
1.27.2008 -
gacabru85@ - age: 18-25
If there where any funny parts at all then it was on the trailers - poor movie, very disappointing, something that I wished I'd have waited to see playing on T.V. during a night to cold to go out and nothing to do sorta deal.
3/10
1.27.2008 -
eatme@ - age: 26-35
This Movie was good. If you didn't like it, your probably to slow to understand whats going on!
9/10
1.27.2008 -
lopez_vanessa@ - age: 18-25
It might have been better if Katie Holmes wasn't in it, just thought she was way to young to play the part.
5/10
1.26.2008 -
lskuse@ - age: 26-35
It was a great movie hilarious and cute, the actors were pretty good but I loved this movie!
10/10
1.26.2008 -
sassystar@ - age: 18-25
I did not have much expectation because of the rating. It was not as bad as what it was rated.
7/10
1.25.2008 -
suek10@ - age: 36-49
I'm not sure why this movie is garnering such mediocre reviews, but both my bf and I thought it was a fairly good movie. Not boring, liked the characters, interesting plot. SOmetimes you just want to be entertained. This was just that. No thinking required.
7/10
1.25.2008 -
jennygel@ - age: 26-35
It was pretty good... lots of good comedy!
7/10
1.24.2008 -
googooodools@ - age: 26-35
I am giving this rating based on the fact that I saw it for $5. Plus: Katie Holmes looked cute. Minus: plot was ok and Diane keatons acting was a little annoying at points. It's a good DVD rental, and for $5 in a theater, it's a good time pass.
6/10
1.24.2008 -
anshu29@ - age: 26-35
A unique new great movie -- lots of fun, suspense & twists -- definitely a keeper -- all the actors are just 'Perfect' for their parts... L.
10/10
1.24.2008 -
leta@ - age: 36-49
This movie was not a very good movie because the ending did not make any sense but it was fun to watch well maybe.
5/10
1.24.2008 -
sadafvafaie@ - age: 1-12
Diane Keaton, you are so much better than this film! I do not understand why a production company would spend millions of dollars and all that time, effort and energy on making a "movie of the week" as a feature film. Go back to film school! Remember the part about screenwriting, where the characters have to care about something larger than themselves? The "great American dream" of having more than enough money with no effort has been done to death. The reality is that that dream has become the great American nightmare with trillions of dollars owed in credit card debt. Come on, there are worthwhile themes to make movies about- watch Blood Diamond, Pan's Labyrinth, 3:10 to Yuma, Away from Her, etc. etc.
5/10
1.23.2008 -
lstewrt@ - age: 36-49
A fun, light-hearted movie for the whole family. Lots of laughs. Katie Holmes, Queen Latifah & Diane Keaton played their roles quite well but Ted Danson was a dud.
7/10
1.23.2008 -
avf@ - age: 50+
The movie wasn't too bad. I've seen worst movies with Oscar nominees! It was a light movie, smart dialogue and quirky characters... what else could you want? The premise of the movie is basic - so just enjoy it for what it is... a night out!
7/10
1.23.2008 -
ande0032@ - age: 36-49
I thought that this movie was very light hearted & entertaining!! I enjoyed it from beginning to end. Sure there's no Oscar nominations here but it was an enjoyable evening out! P. S. I thought that the cast carried the movie quiet well. I loved Katie's character & Dianne was quiet enjoyable to watch too!
8/10
1.23.2008 -
stanely_baby_bot@ - age: 36-49
Why they decided Katie Holmes would be good in this role is beyond me. Her role could have been played by anyone with the ability to speak.
5/10
1.23.2008 -
bobo1514@ - age: 50+
This movie and those who produced and acted in it didn't bother to try. They must think we're all brainwashed scientologists that will enjoy whatever Katie Holmes (cruise)will put out, well I hope the church keeps her and her acting hidden in a church basement far far away! This is one horrible movie.
1/10
1.22.2008 -
dbanderson68@ - age: 36-49
I wasn't expecting much to begin with. This movie was definitely a dud and I'm really surprised hollywood spends money to make this stuff. Diane Keaton is just plain bad and Holmes, well she can't act either.
4/10
1.22.2008 -
girl_fired_up@ - age: 36-49
Such a bad movie, the only reason I went to that movie was because of my lil sister, otherwise I would have never gone there! Diane Keaton as always was horrible and sucked. Waste of time, money, pop, and popcorn!
2/10
1.22.2008 -
vrsc_b@ - age: 18-25
Hilarious - laughed almost through the whole movie - very entertaining and a must see!!!
9/10
1.22.2008 -
cdnhummingbird@ - age: 50+
I already knew the movie wasn't worth my time from the first half-hour. The film lacks in excitement and is constantly dragging on until the end. Speaking of which, the ending was completely predictable as it was practically spelled out to you from the beginning. The story is really badly told, the acting style (not the actor's faults) is horrific and the editing was scary to say the least.
2/10
1.21.2008 -
sweet_heart08@ - age: 18-25
Probably one of the best movies I've seen, After Meangirls... Absolutely LOVE IT!
10/10
1.21.2008 -
kor,mish@ - age: 18-25
It is a very very good movie all the things are good it's a must see movie.
9/10
1.20.2008 -
kendrathompson76@ - age: 13-17
Its really funny and exciting my friend who barely goes to the movies thought it was an awesome movie too.
10/10
1.20.2008 -
the__bosssss@ - age: 13-17
Can you say boring? I fell asleep after I ate my popcorn. Wait for video. Then again, wait for it to be on T. V.
1/10
1.20.2008 -
jshatzky@ - age: 36-49
This movie was funny and entertaining. Diane Keaton, Queen Latifah and Katie Holmes were a great team!
9/10
1.20.2008 -
domain1999@ - age: 50+
Omg I loved that movie it was awesome and another cool thing is that my friend [...] is in it 2 he plays Queen Latifah son dante I think thats his name but anyways yea we are friends I have alot of pics of us 2 hanging out all the time hes really cool but anyways again the movie was awesome!!!
10/10
1.20.2008 -
soccerchik_8@ - age: 13-17
Lousy production values (out of focus at times {not just glowy/soft... actually grainy and murky... to hide Diane's wrinkles? }, occasional continuity glitches {hair not the same from one shot to the next in a scene}, poor editing and a miserably vapid script. Couldn't believe they actually said in effect "well no one will miss it, so why not take it? "!!! Perpetuates all the worst aspects of the American consumer society. It's miserable... what were they thinking? Only bright point is Katie's bopping ditz... question is, was she acting, or... ?
2/10
1.19.2008 -
ngirl@ - age: 50+
Cheaply made, repetitive, simply not going anywhere.
3/10
1.19.2008 -
scandiamed@ - age: 36-49
I really liked it. It was entertaining. I'm glad I went to see it, however I wouldn't go and see it again.
7/10
1.19.2008 -
rinamoger@ - age: 26-35
Do not see this movie. Unless you like boring storylines.
1/10
1.19.2008 -
johnhar78@ - age: 36-49
Katie Holmes couldn't act her way out of a paper bag. She should just continue to follow vb and hope Tom keeps her.
2/10
1.19.2008 -
mcneil@ - age: 18-25
It was just a waste of time. It had its moments but over all it was bad.
2/10
1.19.2008 -
latina_4eva666@ - age: 18-25
Great Movie. Good story line. Some parts kinda reminds me of Inside Man (watch and you'll find out) The movie is full of laughs. Loved Katie Holmes acting in this film. It's worth seeing.
7/10
1.19.2008 -
blaque_qt@ - age: 18-25
This movie is hilarious from start to finish and the charachters are loveable throughout!
8/10
1.19.2008 -
moviebuff1986@ - age: 18-25
Delightfully uplifting ~ don't expect this to be an oscar contender but just good old fashioned fun.
9/10
1.19.2008 -
price,kenton@ - age: 18-25
It's so so. Not worth the big ticket price. Had its moments.
5/10
1.18.2008 -
hottamalee_210@ - age: 18-25
Worst movie I have ever seen. Diane Keaton always plays the same role. She needs to quit Hollywood and go await her [...] somewhere in the mountains.
1/10
1.18.2008 -
anitab@ - age: 26-35
| 
