|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 94)
|
|
 |
I liked watching this movie John & Robin are fun as hell together. You have to see this movie.
7/10
3.17.2010 -
balnesjw@ - age: 26-35
This was the funniest movie I have seen in ages! Hillarious, clean and gotta love the slapstick humour! I did not expect it at all, barely heard anything about the movie and went only because of the actors. A must see if you are a fan of slapstick! Thumbs up from us who poured buckets of tears from laughing so hard. Go see it!
10/10
3.8.2010 -
ggsmerch@ - age: 36-49
This movie at times made me laugh so hard it hurt. Overall it was a good story with to old fart actors. But hey there both still really funny at least.
8/10
3.3.2010 -
cft_elitefitness@ - age: 26-35
Horrible. Worst. Dissaster. Weird. Gross. Dispicable. Disgusting.
1/10
2.21.2010 -
gabsr3erx4ever@ - age: 1-12
This movie was one of the funniest movies that I have seen in a long time. It was all good, clean slapstick humor. It was such a nice surprise. I enjoyed both Williams and Travolta and together they were great.
9/10
2.6.2010 -
greg,lacey@ - age: 36-49
Good old fashioned comedy! Great slap-stick and physical humor. Everybody in the theatre was laughing! Yes it was a little sweet and predictable but it was also enjoyable and certainly kid-friendly. Great for the whole family and by the way the soundtrack had some great songs. Highly recommended for anyone.
9/10
2.5.2010 -
bradchase383@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
I gave this a 7 because Robin Williams is expressive in his main scenes, but Travolta appears ridiculous and arrogant, and the daughter has zero talent. The scene where Williams is dressed as a King is insulting to his ability.
7/10
1.27.2010 -
violbiol@ - age: 18-25
Great to see Robin Williams again, and what a team with Travolta, it's a great comic relief for guys in the middle ages for sure.
9/10
1.12.2010 -
adamfancey@ - age: 26-35
Meh, don't think anything of it, kind of a waste of time and I really like the actors, too bad it wasn't written better.
4/10
1.7.2010 -
kidsathome3@ - age: 36-49
I took a 5 year old and a 15 year old. I really wasn't sure though who the target audience should be. The set up of the circumstances of the twins is way over a young child's head. The business aspect was boring for a child. The slap stick was the only redeeming part. Silly, yes. Laugh out loud funny in parts inspite of the shaky story line.
6/10
1.4.2010 -
yeahright100@ - age: 36-49
Very funny and awesome movie. Really enjoyed it.
10/10
12.31.2009 -
nadiaberube@ - age: 26-35
Awesome movie but not for kids under 7. Anyboy else would love it.
9/10
12.29.2009 -
jjfal99@ - age: 1-12
I though I would be a comedy but it turned out to be more of a sugar or sweet..., a women having twins from a rich business man and not wanting any money had me laughting in the ills...
7/10
12.28.2009 -
cecilchestnut@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
The movie was awesome!!! I went with my dad and we both thought it was amazing!!! It was hilarious, and we laughed so hard. ! It was unbelievable!
9/10
12.24.2009 -
tonyva@ - age: 13-17
Awesome movie... you have to see it...
9/10
12.22.2009 -
mjgerbeza@ - age: 26-35
Absolutely Hilarious!!! A great family movie!
9/10
12.22.2009 -
marianguyen_huong@ - age: 18-25
A real movie for the family! Funny as well! :)
9/10
12.22.2009 -
thecoolkid@
Was typical Disney fare - predictable, middle-of-the-road with the typical saccharine ending. Had a few funny moments, but not enough to fully recommend the movie. Quite slow in some areas – especially when they tried to play up the drama. A good rental.
6/10
12.22.2009 -
ottawamoviegoer@
This is an awesome movie saw the trailors so funny lol go see it!!! IT IS HILARIOUS!!!
10/10
12.21.2009 -
nadia_osmulski@ - age: 1-12
What a great movie!!! It was hilarious!!!
10/10
12.21.2009 -
bi_bi_rocks@ - age: 13-17
Very funny, worth watching. The script could have been stronger but the acting was great and both Williams & Travolta were great :)
8/10
12.20.2009 -
whiteflame,78@ - age: 26-35
There were alot of real good laughs in this picture.
7/10
12.20.2009 -
fn_greywolf@ - age: 36-49
It's great. It's funny. Just awesome.
10/10
12.20.2009 -
epicfailyer@ - age: 18-25
It was one of the funniest movies I have seen in a long long time. I have been suggesting it to all my friends.
10/10
12.19.2009 -
james_the_singer@ - age: 50+
Considering the big names, this movie is quite boring with only a few really good laughes. It is glaringly poorly edited with one staged scene after another spliced together. It's unfortunate because it certainly had the potential for something much better.
5/10
12.18.2009 -
bentztl@ - age: 50+
Overdone storyline, a couple funny moments, but overall not their best movie by far.
4/10
12.18.2009 -
ivanarow@ - age: 26-35
Though the movie did have its highs and lows in comedy, I felt that this was more of a family orientated movie more then it was comedy for these 2 actors to be doing. Comedy was predictable and in most cases was slap stick humour that was easily predictable. Definitely more of a drama comedy.
6/10
12.18.2009 -
fiegen,caa@ - age: 18-25
What I really liked about this movie was that it was very family friendly a rarity these days. Good cast and generally good scenarios for a good laugh a few things were over the top.
7/10
12.17.2009 -
wallbangerglen@ - age: 50+
Terrible!!! With such big names you would think it would have been done better. Who's ultimately responsible for screening films before they are released. In about 95% of the movie you could see the microphone over their head. Did Calgary get the roll of film that wasn't screened or rejected?!?!? It definitely took away from the movie. Kids laughed but then I can make them laugh with a funny face. Don't think the story was anything special. Comedy was weak and predictable. I wouldn't have paid to go see this movie... my work paid for it for the kids X-mas party. I can't understand why anybody would give this movie a higher rating than what it deserves... NONE!
1/10
12.17.2009 -
shaunmorin@ - age: 36-49
Awesome, just brilliant if u havnt seen it get up and go see it! Its really good.
10/10
12.15.2009 -
cujo,143@ - age: 1-12
Hi wish to rate 2.5 Did not think it was funny with mix up of medicines and the seen on cancer Went as I like Robin Williams and he was not the best Also theatre was dead very predictable ending.
3/10
12.15.2009 -
visser3@ - age: 26-35
Couldn't stop laughing as soon as the pills are switched!! My stomach is still hurting!!
9/10
12.14.2009 -
petecabral71@ - age: 36-49
It was not that funny to me it was very boring.
1/10
12.13.2009 -
tyler_788@ - age: 1-12
It's a great little family movie to take your kids to. Either I was too tired to enjoy much of the comedy or it just didn't tickle my funny bone. There was a lot of slap stick type humour in it.
6/10
12.13.2009 -
weeangel_99@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
It was a pretty good movie, some funny scenes but it was to fast I wanted it to be longer but still amazing and good actors.
10/10
12.13.2009 -
marc_medeiros92@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
That movie was Really, really good.
8/10
12.12.2009 -
noah30@ - age: 13-17
It is funny but not as much as I was told. Not a Waw...
6/10
12.11.2009 -
enalepto@ - age: 50+
If you had stressed out day at work, this would be a great movie to watch. Didnt have a great plot, but will definitely give you a laugh.
7/10
12.11.2009 -
kevinchow_@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
It was a very funny movie nobody should miss it funny movie!
8/10
12.9.2009 -
saly579@ - age: 18-25
Poorly stitched together script. Predictable, but mildly entertaining. Good laughs in second half of the movie. Better rental than theatre.
6/10
12.9.2009 -
danielmarie@ - age: 36-49
It was a nice funny movie but it seems too short. Off the wall humor!. my BF likes it!
6/10
12.8.2009 -
mimisevilla1531@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
I was on my way to see the blind side and got my times wrong so I had a choice between Old Dogs and We Are All Fine. Both looked bad but I was already there so I went with Old Dogs. The movie was super lame! Very few laugh's mostly over done crap. The movie will make you tense do to the embarrassing overacting and painful script. I wonder who wears more makeup between these two and Nicolas Cage. I am convinced the people giving this a 10 were paid off.
2/10
12.8.2009 -
michjulien@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Simply idiotic. There are many options available for you spend your 10+ dollars that are more rewarding than this movie. Buy a book, eat some lunch, take a friend out for coffee, donate to Sun Youth, tear the cash to shreds & save the 1.5 hours of your life that you'll never get back.
1/10
12.7.2009 -
coffeespoons@ - age: 36-49
This movie makes me wonder what are these actors thinking when they read the scripts. It has a few funny parts, but is contrived. A mish mash of scenes telling a lame (unbelievable) story. Do these actors want to destroy their careers? Keep accepting these type of roles and it's a sure thing. Enjoy the show! (Just not this one)
4/10
12.6.2009 -
jdjefford@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
It was just 'okay'. Seems to have skipped the editing phase - in many scenes you could see suspended microphones at the top of the screen - which was very distracting.
6/10
12.6.2009 -
lmacmor@ - age: 36-49
Here is the movie. Bored for 10 minutes. Laugh at something really stupid. Bored for 10 minutes. Laugh at something really stupid... and so on and so on. What a bunch of fluff. This movie was pointless.
4/10
12.5.2009 -
rodneywareham@
| | | | |
This was a great relax, and laugh movie. It wasn't designed to have movie goers have a great thought provoking experience. It was a feel good be happy with your life movie. Its nice to see a movie minus the violence and cursing fond in action movies. I love to see Williams and Travolta in movies. They make a good team.
7/10
12.5.2009 -
moodymb@ - age: 36-49
Good slapstick humour. John and Robin seem to work well together and play off of each other. I enjoyed this movie and laughed in many parts of the movie. Seth Green is great.
8/10
12.5.2009 -
rjmcgoo@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
This movie is for young kids at best... If you are looking for classic Williams then look elsewhere. I think it's his worst performance ever mostly due to a dreadful script and poor direction. Travolta was not much better. I wonder if Travolta being a producer and his daughter's role, was a contributing factor to such a mediocre production for such heavy weights.
1/10
12.5.2009 -
itishere@ - age: 50+
| | | | |
It suck really bad I won't go to see it again for a million dollars.
1/10
12.5.2009 -
hugobarraza10@ - age: 36-49
| 
